| |
This is the largest project that the IRRDB has ever financed with
funds provided by its Member Institutes; it is also one of the most
interesting and possibly most important exercises ever undertaken
by the industry. No other other organization in the industry could
have undertaken the exercise on such a large scale, and with such
excellent co-operation between many countries.
The objective is easiest to describe in a historical context. The
entire rubber plantation industry in Asia and Africa, totalling
about 9 million hectares, comes from the progeny of the 70,000 seeds
collected by Sir Henry Wickham in Brazil during the space of a few
weeks in 1876 - or, to be precise, from the small number of seedlings
from germinated from seeds that had survived the shipment from Kew
Gardens, London to Asia. It has long been recognized that this degree
of inbreeding is undesirable, that widening the genetic base of
Hevea is an essential prerequisite to obtaining clones with novel
and valuable characteristics in terms of productivity, resistance
to disease and to extreme environmental conditions.
The IRRDB project was the first major systematic attempt to replenish
Hevea's genetic base by collecting new germplasm from the Amazonian
rain forest in a scientific manner. The principal requirements were
spelt out at an IRRDB Seminar in Indonesia, and in 1977 an IRRDB
Workshop on International Collaboration in Hevea Breeding and the
Collection and Establishment of Materials from the Neo-Tropics took
matters a stage further. The Workshop recommended that, before starting
to collect, the IRRDB should send a preliminary mission to South
America, to explore the scientific and political aspects of the
project. This mission, took place over September/November 1978,
visiting Venezuela, Columbia, Bolivia, Peru, Brazil, French Guiana,
Guyana, Guadeloupe and Trinidad. Governmental authorities in these
countries expressed interest in co-operation with the IRRDB.
During 1979, plans became crystallized. In March the Brazilian
authorities agreed with the basic concept of a co-operative exercise
with the IRRDB. At its meeting in June the IRRDB Board agreed that
collections be limited initially to Brazil, that the IRRDB would
co-operate fully to achieve the requirements of Brazil, that Guadeloupe
be chosen as the intermediate quarantine centre, and that two IRRDB
Germplasm Centres should be set up in the Côte d'Ivoire and
Malaysia.
Over October/November 1979 plans moved towards finality: after
further meetings all the components of the project (finance, logistics
of the expedition, collection targets, organization of intermediate
quarantine stations, location of the 'Gene Banks', and so on) were
settled. The collection expedition took place over January-April
1981, the immediate outcome being a collection at Manaus of 63,768
seeds, 1413 metres of budwood and 1160 seedlings. By 1986 the number
of genotypes from seeds was 9000 in Malaysia and 1400 in Côte
d'Ivoire, and the budwood at the intermediate quarantine nursery
in Guadeloupe had been transferred to the two Centres. During the
mid 1980s material was shipped to every member institute that requested
it (each made its own choice).
It was never suppposed that this collection would immediately yield
material ready for commercial exploitation (ie new clones). After
all, it has required 75 years of breeding work to convert the Wickham
importations into clones with good productivity (such work has increased
yields by a factor of about 10). The objective was to provide a
much wider range of genetic material for incorporation into breeding
programmes. So it has turned out: those institutes who have started
to compare the breeding potential of the new Amazonian germplasm
with the 19th century Wickham genotypes report, for example that
"genetic diversity studies have revealed the existence of greater
allelic wealth in the Amazonian germplasm than in the Wickham group".
Good results are expected by developing Wickham × Amazonian
crosses. There are also signs that some of the genotypes may offer
features lacking in existing planting material, such as better resistance
to low temperatures, a feature which is important in some producing
regions.
The cost of the collection (US$ 250 000) was covered by voluntary
contributions from each member institute, and between 1982 and 1998
the cost of maintaining the trees at the two Germplasm Centres was
paid by the IRRDB through the regular Membership contributions.
|
|