| |
Road
Surface Dressings
Many elastomers (including natural rubber), both in their
virgin form and as recycled materials (mainly from scrap
tyres) have been, and are being added to bitumen (asphalt)
to enhance the properties of road surface dressings. There
has been interest in rubber as a paving material for a long
time. Rubber has been admixed with bitumen to improve the
durability of roads since the 1930s and there have been
many programmes instigated mainly by elastomer producers.
The elastomers have been evaluated in the form of latices
and as both vulcanized and unvulcanized powders (fine particles)
and crumbs (larger particles). Rubbers range from the very
cheap (various off-grade materials) to the relatively expensive,
such as polychloroprene and thermoplastic elastomers.
The viscoelastic properties of the bitumen are modified
by the addition of elastomeric materials. Claims made by
Mullins for modified bitumens include:
- longer life for the surface dressings,
- reduction in cracking and fatting up,
- improved resistance to flow or deformation,
- improved adhesion and resistance to stripping,
- reduction in aquaplaning (the water drainage capacity
may be increased) and road noise,
- the low temperature properties (Shim-Ton) of the surface
dressing are also improved,
- in many cases it is possible to achieve a reduction
in the pavement thickness,
- it is possible to lay the material under a wider range
of climatic conditions,
- in countries such as India, which lack an adequate domestic
supply of bitumen, the use of rubber crumb from scrap
may be regarded as a means of limiting imports.
Tests by Smith showed that unvulcanized materials (latices
or powders) are about twice as effective as vulcanized virgin
materials. Tyre scrap only showed a very marginal enhancement
in the properties of the bitumen in comparison with these
materials. Nevertheless, it is at least questionable whether
it would be detrimental. An inherent problem is that bitumen
is a very cheap material, and most elastomers are very expensive
in comparison with it. Furthermore, the laying of surface
dressings tends to be highly competitive, and any modification
of the process is bound to lead to a major distortion of
the costs. The incorporation of an elastomer may lead to
an increase in costs of well in excess of 10%. Dunn estimates
that the pavement life may be approximately doubled, although
the cost is increased by between 50 and 100%. Thus any enhancements
to the durability of the dressing have to be very large
to cover the increase in preparation costs. Within this
type of environment there is a need for state intervention.
Ultimately, more durable roads are advantageous to users
as less road space is wasted on repairs and journeys are
less liable to delay. Similarly, a reduction in road noise
offers considerable environmental benefits which can only
be achieved otherwise by lower speed limits. Rubberized
roads are safer and should reduce accidents.
The United States introduced, but did not implement, legislation
which would have required individual states to order scrap
tyres to be incorporated within federally financed road
surfacing projects. As originally drafted, from 1994 5%
of federally funded roads which are currently paved with
asphalt should have contained rubber from scrap tyres, and
that percentage should have increased by 5% annually until
1997. Pressure from individual states and from the bitumen
suppliers (who would lose some of their market) led to the
postponement of the measure. There appears to be little
European interest in the use of discarded tyres in surface
dressings for roads. The natural rubber producing countries
remain highly interested, however.
References
- Dunn J, Recycling/reuse of elastomers - an overview,
Rubber Division, American Chemical Society, Orlando, Florida,
Fall 1993
- Mullins L, NR Technology, 1971 (3)
- Shim-Ton J, Rubber Chemistry and Technology, 1980, 53,
88
- Smith L, Journal of Applied Chemistry 1960, 10, 296
- Eastman A, United States scrap tyre alternatives, markets
& solutions, Rubber Division, American Chemical Society,
Orlando, Florida, Fall, 1993
|
|